Description

Abstract: Aflatoxin analysis, with post-column derivatization using a photochemical reactor for enhanced detection (PHRED) system for derivatization, has been compared to the officially recognized iodine and Kobra cell derivatization systems. This photochemical system has been extensively used for screening peanuts by some U.S. Department of Agriculture laboratories for many years. From their periodic method checks, using standard spiked samples, an 80 sample series with each of the 3 derivatization methods was statistically analyzed. Paired comparisons, using the same sample extract, were also made between the PHRED and one of the other 2 methods, among laboratories in 4 different countries, on a variety of naturally contaminated commodity products. The differences between the techniques were not significant for peanuts, but for corn the photochemical system consistently gave slightly higher values for aflatoxins B1 and B2 than the Kobra cell method. However, a comparison of all sample results showed no significant differences between methods. The Pearson correlation coefficients for aflatoxin B1 in 102 test samples and aflatoxin B2 in 94 test samples were 0.9994 and 0.9874, respectively. The probability factor was P < 0.0001, and the t-tests were not significantly different except for the corn. These indicated that the PHRED system is equivalent to the iodine and Kobra cell methods for peanuts relative to the current official procedures, but the PHRED system has a slightly high bias for corn compared to the iodine and Kobra cell systems.