Development of Soup from Nutrient Dense Ban Based Composite Flour

CRSP:   |  Region:   |  Topic:   |  Database:
Details

Author(s):
P. Habinshuti; A. Bagirishya; H. Vasanthakaalam; I. Nyagahungu; A. Karayire; R. Mazur; D. Nakimbugwe

Type of Document:
Media

 

Publisher/Journal:
Not Available

Date of Publication:
February 2012

Place of Publication:
Not Available

Description

A poster presented at the 2012 Global Pulse Researchers Meeting, Kigali, Rwanda- “Transforming Grain-Legume Systems to Enhance Nutrition and Livelihoods”. Abstract: The study aimed to develop nutrient dense bean-based composite flour from beans and six other locally grown vegetables; to analyze its nutritive value and functional properties; to process soup from the developed flour and assess its consumer acceptability. Methodology: Fresh beans were subjected to a combined treatment of soaking, germination, de-hulling, parboiling, drying and milling into flour. Vegetables were subjected to: washing, size reduction, blanching, drying and milling. Flours obtained were mixed in different proportions. The mix was termed “CRSP – KIST – PANAMIX”. Four samples (A, B, C, and D) of the composite flour were formulated using bean, moringa leaves, potato, tomato, carrots, leeks and garlic flours in the ratios of 70:10:8:4:4:2:2 (A), 60:20:8:4:4:2:2 (B), 50:30:8:4:4:2:2 (C), and 40:40:8:4:4:2:2 (D). 15 panellists rated the prepared soups. Functional properties analyzed were bulk density, pH, oil absorption capacity; water absorption capacity and wettability. Results: Functional properties of sample A had 0.88 g/cc, 5.67, 2.4 ml/g, 5.8 ml/g and 50.6 seconds, respectively. Sample B had 0.86 g/cc, 5.45, 2.65 ml/g, 6.5 ml/g and 53 seconds, respectively. Proximate chemical composition of accepted combinations (A and B) of samples viz., ash, ?-carotene, calcium, carbohydrate, crude fat, crude protein, total energy, crude fiber and moisture content were 10.26%, 79.12 mg/100 g, 0.88%, 51.40%, 7.1%, 11.98%, 317.47 Kcal/g, 13.9% and 5.34%, respectively, for Sample A.It was 9.12%, 173.56 mg/100g, 1.06%, 46.26%, 11.00%, 13.825%, 339.34 Kcal/g, 12.42%, and 7.37%, respectively, for Sample B. Final sensory evaluation revealed no significant difference between soups (p<0.05). B was higher in ?-carotene, calcium, crude fat, crude protein and total energy. Significance: Soup made from common dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) was acceptable with high nutritional value.

Additional Bibliographic Information

Coming soon

Send us your questions or comments

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Comment

Please enter this text:
captcha

[current-page]